Fork of DanielCheer/obsidian-web-viewer (MIT, 2026-04) with Lukas' first additions for the Hermes Wiki workflow. Additive customization layer (vault-custom.js) — keeps upstream-merge trivial via a one-line script tag in vault.html. Features added: 1. Current-page highlighting in 3D Graph — current node gold+glow, connected nodes light-blue, others dim to 20% opacity 2. Click-to-navigate on graph — Three.js raycaster triggers file load 3. Responsive layout — graph collapses below 1024px, tree below 768px 4. URL-based deep-linking via ?file=<path> query param 5. Server-side ?file= support in /api/vault/file/ endpoint Modified files: - server.py: +7 lines (Lukas-add: ?file= query param parsing) - vault.html: +1 line (script tag for vault-custom.js) New files: - vault-custom.js: 11KB, all customizations in one place under HermesCustom namespace - README.md: fork intro, quick start, customization guide - CHANGELOG.md: Lukas-additions tracking - docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: design rationale - docs/CUSTOMIZATIONS.md: feature spec - .gitignore: standard 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.7 KiB
Architecture
Why this fork exists
DanielCheer/obsidian-web-viewer is a great single-file Obsidian-vault viewer (server.py + vault.html, ~10 KB + 14 KB, Python stdlib only). But for Lukas' Hermes Wiki workflow — 245 Markdown files across 18 top-level folders, frequent cross-referencing via WikiLinks, mobile reading — three specific UX gaps needed fixing:
- 3D Graph shows all nodes uniformly — no indication of which node the user is currently reading or which nodes are connected to it
- Layout breaks on small screens — the 3-panel grid (
280px 1fr 260px) is too narrow on 13" laptops and unusable on phones - Click-to-navigate from graph — Three.js canvas accepts clicks but doesn't trigger navigation
Design principles
1. Additive layer, not fork-and-modify
We modify exactly one line in vault.html (a <script src="vault-custom.js"></script> tag before </body>). Everything else — including the customizations themselves — lives in vault-custom.js.
Why:
- Upstream
git pullconflicts are trivial to resolve (the one line is recognizable) - Customizations are clearly separated from upstream code
- Reviewing customizations is reading one file, not diffing the whole repo
- Easier to upstream-merge back if Lukas' features prove generally useful
2. HermesCustom namespace
All custom code lives under window.HermesCustom. Methods are namespaced and self-documenting:
window.HermesCustom = window.HermesCustom || {};
HermesCustom.highlightCurrentNode = function() { ... };
HermesCustom.setupGraphClickHandler = function() { ... };
HermesCustom.responsiveLayout = function() { ... };
This way the namespace is visible in DevTools and a future maintainer can see at a glance what's custom vs. upstream.
3. Server.py stays mostly upstream
We add one enhancement to server.py: a ?file=<path> query parameter that returns the file directly (used by HermesCustom.highlightCurrentNode to know which file is open). This is a 5-line change that doesn't conflict with any upstream logic.
If upstream adds a similar feature, we drop our addition.
File map
hermes-wiki-viewer/
├── server.py # obv-fork + 5 lines (file-query-param)
├── vault.html # obv-fork + 1 line (script tag for custom.js)
├── vault-custom.js # ALL Lukas-specific code
├── requirements.txt # PyYAML only (same as upstream)
├── README.md # this repo's entry point
├── LICENSE # MIT (inherited)
├── CHANGELOG.md # release notes for Lukas-additions
├── docs/
│ ├── ARCHITECTURE.md # you are here
│ └── CUSTOMIZATIONS.md # spec for each Lukas-feature
└── .gitignore # standard
Why we keep vault-custom.js separate from vault.html
Embedding customizations into vault.html would mean:
- Every upstream update requires re-applying the entire diff
- Reviewing customizations requires diffing two HTML files
- Conflicts when upstream renames a function we override
A separate file means:
- The customizations are a stable, reviewable unit
- Upstream updates touch
vault.htmlonly, customizations are unchanged - The one-line patch in
vault.htmlis a clear "anchor point" that any reviewer can understand
Why Python stdlib only (no Flask/FastAPI)
Upstream uses http.server from stdlib. We keep this. Adding a framework would:
- Inflate dependencies
- Require version-pinning for reproducibility
- Make the tool harder to deploy (anywhere with Python 3.8+ works)
The 5-line addition to server.py is plain stdlib BaseHTTPRequestHandler style.
Tradeoffs we accepted
- No build step. Customizations are vanilla JS. No bundler, no TypeScript. Means no static type-checking, but means anyone can read and modify the code without toolchain setup.
- No tests in CI. We rely on manual testing for now. CI tests would add complexity that doesn't match the project's "simple tool" character. (Future: a small Playwright test for the graph highlighting.)
- No auto-update from upstream. When obv updates, Lukas has to
git pull upstream && git merge. The one-linevault.htmlpatch needs re-application if upstream modified it. This is acceptable for a personal side-project.
Roadmap
See CHANGELOG.md for planned additions. Current priorities:
- ✅ Current-page highlighting in 3D Graph
- ✅ Click-to-navigate on graph
- ✅ Responsive layout (1024px and 768px breakpoints)
- ⏳ Backlinks panel (per-page incoming WikiLinks)
- ⏳ Keyboard shortcuts (j/k for next/prev file, [/] for nav, g/G for graph focus)
- ⏳ Light theme variant (currently Catppuccin-dark only)